How Do You Spell ALEXANDER LITVINENKO POISONING?

Pronunciation: [ˌalɪɡzˈandə lˌɪtvɪnˈɛnkə͡ʊ pˈɔ͡ɪzənɪŋ] (IPA)

The spelling of "Alexander Litvinenko poisoning" can be explained using IPA phonetic transcription. The first word, "Alexander," is pronounced /ælɪgˈzændər/ with the stress on the second syllable. The last name, "Litvinenko," is pronounced /lɪtvɪˈnɛŋkoʊ/ with the stress on the third syllable. Finally, "poisoning" is pronounced /ˈpɔɪznɪŋ/ with the stress on the first syllable. This term refers to the highly controversial incident in 2006 where former Russian spy, Alexander Litvinenko, was poisoned with a toxic substance.

ALEXANDER LITVINENKO POISONING Meaning and Definition

  1. Alexander Litvinenko poisoning refers to the high-profile assassination of Alexander Litvinenko, a Russian intelligence officer turned whistleblower, who was fatally poisoned in London in 2006. It is widely believed that his poisoning was a deliberate act carried out by agents of the Russian government.

    Litvinenko was poisoned with a radioactive substance called polonium-210, which was administered to him through a cup of tea in a hotel. Initially, he fell ill and was hospitalized with symptoms that puzzled doctors. However, shortly before his death, Litvinenko stated that he believed he had been poisoned to silence him for his criticism and exposure of corruption within the Russian government.

    The poisoning garnered significant attention due to the use of a highly unusual radioactive substance, which posed a significant risk to public health. Investigations into the incident concluded that the polonium-210 was most likely obtained by the perpetrators from a nuclear power plant in Russia. The incident strained diplomatic relations between the United Kingdom and Russia, leading to a deterioration in their bilateral ties.

    The Alexander Litvinenko poisoning case highlighted the use of covert tactics, such as assassinations, by intelligence agencies, raising concerns about state-sponsored violence and the targeting of whistleblowers. It also underscored the importance of international cooperation in investigating such incidents, as well as the need for greater accountability and transparency in relations between governments.